Friday, May 30, 2008

The War on Bugs

Don’t let the title of Will Allen’s book, The War on Bugs, fool you. Before I picked it up, I thought it would be a book specifically about bugs and what types of horrible pesticides have been sold to farmers to destroy them. My assumptions were partially true, but thankfully instead of merely repeating what we all know about the dangers of noxious chemicals, Allen puts pesticide use into a 160 year historical context, showing how early chemical fertilizers gave rise to pesticides, and pesticides gave rise to genetically modified foods and animal hormone treatment. He discusses how the anti-personnel chemicals, developed during war-time research, have become the chemicals that are still on the food we eat, and how pharmaceutical and even oil companies have a huge stake in the continuation of pesticide use (as if we environmentalists needed another reason to hate the oil industry).

Rather than re-telling this story from the consumer standpoint with which I’m sure all of the readers of this blog are familiar, Allen tells this story from a farmer’s perspective. He makes it clear that the real tragedy in the story is that no one has the economic interests of small and medium sized farmers in mind. The government, advertisers, and large-scale farms have all sided with the chemical companies, and have been driving a nurturing and natural ethic out of the agricultural industry. Sure, advertisers used war rhetoric to advocate pest extermination, but the subtext of this book is that the real war going on is between organic and chemical factions, and unless consumers and farmers realize that chemicals and nature don’t mix, our society will have some serious, fatal consequences to deal with.

One of the great things about Allen’s book is his extensive documentation of over a century and a half of advertising graphics that have been printed in farm journals and elsewhere, in order to lull American farmers into feeling comfortable with spraying enormous amounts of toxins on the land. I can imagine this combination of Americana-type prints and narrative style being very popular with those who are both American History buffs and environmentalists.

There is only one qualification I might make about this book, however:
My Father’s family comes from Missouri, which he (among others) endearingly refers to as “the show me state”. If you plan on giving this book to a sibling, friend, or parent who is unconvinced that chemicals are bad for you (hah. You have a “unique” person on your hands.), or if you come from Missouri yourself, this book may not be what you’re looking for. It’s heavier on the narrative and a little skimpy on the citations.

However, if you want to hear the story of a man who has had the unique position of having grown up on a pesticide-using farm, who then served in the Marine Corps studying war chemicals and treatment, and then who became a successful organic farmer, surprise! I found a book for you.

~Megan Geuss

Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Should We Bring Back the National 55 MPH Speed Limit?

Wired's Autotopia blog ask its readers an interesting question; the question being "Is It Time To Drive 55 Again?" It's an intriguing question indeed as gasoline prices continue to soar past $4.00 a gallon, air pollution continues to rise, and our little ol' blue planet slowly starts to warm up. Taking all these factors into consideration, is it time to bring back the national 55 mph speed limit?

As a response to the oil crisis of the '70s, Congress and President Nixon imposed a nationwide 55 mph speed limit in order to conserve energy. However, since 1993, the law has been repealed allowing states, once again, to set legal speed limits. Though the today's oil "crisis" is not as bad as the '70s rationing system -- at least not yet -- it is interesting to see a national speed limit debate resurface.

Regardless of whether or not a national speed limit law is passed, it is still good practice to drive at a speed that is still safe yet not excessively fast. Start using the slower right lanes in traffic and plan accordingly -- whether it be waking up earlier -- in anticipation for a longer commute. Doing so will not only help out your wallet at the pump, but it will also reduce the impact on the environment by lowering emissions.

[source]

Photo credit by Consumer Guide Automotive

Written by AJ Papa

Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Summer of the Shark

PhotobucketI have recently read that there was a second shark attack that ended in a fatality in Mexico on a beach that hasn't had a shark attack in years. There hasn't been any large sharks at this beach due to irresponsible fishing and specifically targeting larger sharks to relieve the fears of tourists that are vital to the community's economy. The resort mentioned is ZIHUATANEJO, MEXICO which if it really cared about tourism would promote healthy ecological practices because once the biodiversity has disappeared so goes the attraction of the ocean.

Every year more people are surfing and using the ocean for recreation and every year we kill more and more sharks and their food sources. It's simple math, the more people in the ocean, the less the sharks have to eat, the more attacks there will be on people. Now the dynamics of ecology is more complicated than that but some common sense can be applied whether your a biologist or not. As the top predators of the ocean become extinct an ecological collapse will be inevitable, this type of devastation to the earth's oceans can not be completely predicted but some inferences can be made. Please educate yourself when you buy any products that come from the ocean and please don't fall for the media's scare tactics. I know its trite and everyone has heard this but you really are more likely to die from driving to the beach than you are to die in the beach from a shark attack. More specifically if you are in Mexico you are more likely to die from food poisoning than you are to die from a shark.

Ty Spaulding
Associate degree in Biology.
Biology student with an emphasis in ecology.
Current research assistant for climate change in the Arctic at the University of Alaska.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Green Industry Booming

With all the hype about being green, a new emerging industry has finally arrived and is growing every year. The alternative energy industry is hiring solar panel workers, wind power installers, maintenance workers, engineers, researchers, scientists, and all the white collar jobs associated with every industry like financing and logistics. The green industry is standing out to be a growing industry year over year while other industries like in manufacturing are retracting in the slowing economy.

Personally as a young engineer in the semiconductor field, I am extremely worried that the economy could force my company to cut back spending and possibly lay off workers. I would be the first to go since I only have two years experience versus other co-workers with 10 years or more.

States like California have the majority of these so called "green collared" workers, but other parts of the country like Oregon, Washington, and Texas have green niches as well. You really just have to be lucky enough to already live near an existing green hub in order to transition into this new field.



Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Oil Prices hit a Record $130 a Barrel

A new record high for the price of oil occurred today. It achieved an all time high of over $130 a barrel!

What this sadly means for all of us is that gas prices will continue to go up, but also everything else will go up in price as well. If transportation costs keep going up, everything will have to go up in price in order to maintain a profit for most businesses. These are issues we should all be really worried about. At what point does the trucking industry and cab industries start to go on strike because of how much money they are losing to the high prices of gasoline and diesel?


U.S. crude hit a peak of $130.47 before easing to $129.71, up 73 cents. Billionaire T. Boone Pickens, that I've mentioned in a previous post said on Tuesday he expected oil to hit $150 a barrel this year. Some of the reasons the price of oil is so high is due to a weak U.S. dollar and due to long-term production worries and a near-term focus on tight fuel stocks.

I have resorted to drastic measures including refusing to drive my car on my days off from work even though I own a hybrid. I am voluntarily boycotting gas on my days off. I am walking, biking, and riding my electric scooter around town a lot more. In fact, I feel liberated and free from the hassles of driving. I think other people would feel the same if they just tried it. I refuse to buy gas for leisure if the prices of gas are going to remain this high. So far studies have suggested that Americans have not changed their driving habits even though prices have gone up. But studies have shown an increased demand for hybrids once again.

If you have changed your driving habits, I would love to hear about it. What are you doing about these insane gas prices?

Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

LA Plans a Massive Water Conservation Plan

A $2 billion proposal to conserve water for the City of Los Angeles California has reached city officials who will take a serious look at the future of water. The plan proposes a massive water conservation plan to conserve about 32 billion gallons of water each year!

Part of the plan includes reclaiming or recycling water from sewage back into the drinking water supply. It also includes building systems to capture and treat rainwater and runoff. The proposal also requires restrictions for homes watering their lawns and people washing their cars to certain days of the week.

According to the LA Times:


Financial incentives and building code changes would be used to incorporate high-tech conservation equipment in homes and businesses. Builders would be pushed to install waterless urinals, weather-sensitive sprinkler systems and porous parking lot paving that allows rain to percolate into groundwater supplies.

So I guess it's time for everyone in the LA area to start doing their part. LA needs to to do this in order to support an increase of 15% in demand for water by 2030. If nothing is done, water restrictions could end up as serious as it is in Georgia where extreme drought has caused the state to take drastic measures.

Easy things can be done to conserve water:
  • Don't leave the water running when you brush your teeth
  • Put a brick in the toilet so less water is needed to flush
  • Take shorter showers or bath once every other day (it's not going to kill you)
  • Purchase a water barrel and capture rain runoff from your roof for your summer gardens
  • Re-use a dish or cup to prevent overuse of dishwasher

    Believe it or not, doing these things helps you conserve water which is great for the environment, but it also can save you money on your water bill. We really need to be aware of issues like water conservation so there is plenty for everyone and for the generations to come.

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

  • Billionaire Oilman to Invest in World's Largest Wind Farm

    Multi-billionaire T.Boone Pickens has decided to invest billions of dollars into which will most likely be the largest wind farm in the world. Pickens plans on setting up 600 wind turbines in Central Texas with the hopes of producing "enough power for the equivalent of 1.3 million homes." Not only has Pickens considered alternative energy, but he has also considered land usage as he plans on using other people's land to host the turbines which will also generate $20,000 in royalties to the land owners. As ironic as it sounds, Pickens has accumulated his wealth from being a business man, since his early years, in the oil business.

    He currently chairs the hedge fund for BP Capital Management -- BP being one of the worlds largest energy companies that mainly relies on oil, natural gas, and petroleum. In his appearance on CNN, Pickens explains his justifications for choosing wind energy. In correlation with the rising cost per barrel and lack of production to meet demand, he was asked if wind energy is the future for the United States in which he simply responds, "It's got to be part of it because we don't have much oil." It is interesting to see as the proverbial spigot for oil dries up how energy companies that are heavily reliant on oil will try to use alternative energy sources to turn a profit. Could this be the beginning of a trend for other oilmen? [Source via Slashdot]

    Written By: AJ Papa

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Monday, May 19, 2008

    Solar Industry Booming

    A survey conducted by two research college students in California indicates that the solar industry is doing very well for the most populous state.

    They surveyed 212 solar companies in the state, of which 77 of them were in the Bay Area. The solar energy industry has created jobs for installers, engineers, and other miscellaneous working class jobs. These are jobs that have been lost over the years and the conclusion based from the industry survey is that there aren't enough workers. An estimated 5,000 jobs could be created by next year.

    The salaries would vary upon level of experience. Entry-level solar installers make a median salary of $31,200 per year, while more experienced installers earn up to $60,000 a year. Experienced solar designers and engineers earn a median salary of $83,000. These are great salaries for people with different skills. Most of the jobs like solar installers would not require a degree to qualify for the job.

    Currently the two researchers estimated that California employs between 16,500 and 17,500 people already. California will require energy companies to diversify their energy portfolio through 20% renewable energy like solar, wind, and geothermal energy. But some California legislators are thinking about increasing the renewable portfolio standard to 33% by 2020. If California does enact such a law, they will be truly be a model for the rest of the country.

    The California solar industry has even expanded into nearby states for cheaper manufacturing plants. With this industry on the rise, it may be wise for people to position themselves to catch the wave of this new and exciting market.

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    MIT Tracks the Carbon Footprints of Americans

    carbon footprint"Going green" seems to be the trendy slogan these days in the United States with companies and individuals making both economic and lifestyle changes that reduce the impact on the environment. As such, we've seen an increase in mass media coverage with celebrities setting public example such as Julia Louis-Dreyfus -- who recently spoke on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno about her active environmentally friendly lifestyle. Despite the slowly increasing awareness and lifestyle changes of the American public, how much exactly does the different American lifestyles contribute to environmental impact? A recent study at MIT decided to tackle the tall order of tracking the environmental impact, specifically carbon footprints, of the different American lifestyles. As it's well known that the United States is the leading country in carbon emissions; so it is no surprise that even the lowest energy using American still contributes significantly more than the global average. A recent Eureka Alert article discusses the situation in the United States:

    An MIT class has estimated the carbon emissions of Americans in a wide variety of lifestyles--from the homeless to multimillionaires, from Buddhist monks to soccer moms--and compared them to those of other nations. The somewhat disquieting bottom line is that in the United States, even the people with the lowest usage of energy are still producing, on average, more than double the global per-capita average. And those emissions rise steeply from that minimum as people's income increases: The class estimated Bill Gates' impact as about 10,000 times the average.

    With the increasing trendiness in the United States of going green, and as an American myself, it is certainly food for thought that still shows the disparity of lifestyles in a global context, regardless of environmental awareness. [Source]

    Written by: AJ Papa

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Why Animals Matter

    Most people would agree that animal cruelty is wrong, but how many people in the general public comprehend how cruel the meat, fur industry, animal experimentation, pet, entertainment, and hunting industries can really be? For most Americans, it is easier to turn a blind eye to animal cruelty than take some simple steps to eradicate it.

    It was with a great deal of trepidation that I undertook Why Animals Matter: The Case for Animal Protection, by Erin E. Wells and Margo DeMello. I am notoriously soft hearted when it comes to animals—companion, farmed, or wild—but like many people in this country, I often turn a blind eye to the aforementioned industries in favor of convenience. While I certainly realize that the juicy steak I ate last week came from a living breathing cow, to this point I have managed to detach myself enough to focus on the end result as opposed to the process by which the meat found its way to my plate.

    I can no longer plead ignorance of animal cruelty no matter the realm in which it occurs. Of the various industries that Wells and DeMello write about, the meat industry stands out as the most striking and troubling. For instance, cows, pigs, chickens--and any other variety of animal that comes of age on a factory farm--live a ridiculously miserable life. For me, it is near impossible to ruminate at length on a crate crammed full of sick and injured animals with open sores, broken limbs, often resorting to cannibalism to stay alive for one more miserable day. Underfed and lacking water, medical attention, and living a strikingly abbreviated life, the plight of an animal at the mercy of the meat industry is a horrible one. However, it is increasingly important—for animals and the environment at large—to think over issues of animal cruelty and the accompanying ripple effect of pollution, violence, and injustice.

    Besides the obvious animal cruelty, Wells and DeMello make a compelling case for sweeping changes in the meat industry to positively impact the environment. For example, the meat industry is one of the largest causes of deforestation and water pollution in the world. As the meat industry reaches into the depths of South America, for example, millions of acres of rainforest are stripped to make room for factory farms.

    My initial fear in reading and reviewing this book was the emotional impact it would have on me. Admittedly, the section on the pet industry brought me to tears, and I had to hug my dog for a good bit afterwards. To counteract the overwhelming nature of their subject Wells and DeMello wisely include success stories about animals saved from lives of cruelty. For example, in 2000, a retired greyhound named Fever was adopted by a neglectful owner. After aging beyond her racing career her first adopter allowed her to dwindle to a startling 28 pounds. Luckily for Fever, a second adopter took over her care, got immediate veterinary attention, and Fever lived a life of love and fulfillment until her death in 2004.

    Many such happy stories populate the pages of Why Animals Matter, giving the reader a sense of the goodness that exists in the world and the overwhelming amount of people who are willing to go the distance to make an animal’s life luxurious and fulfilling. I am extremely pleased to have tackled this book as it was richly educational and I dare say life-changing. I plan to be much more diligent about issues of animal cruelty including seeking out options besides factory farmed meat, I would love to join the ASPCA, and volunteer at a local animal aid organization.

    Reviewed by Andi Miller

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Saturday, May 17, 2008

    West Coast Sea Bird Endangered?

    The ashy storm-petrel is a small, smoke-gray seabird that nests and forages almost exclusively on the offshore islands and waters of California near San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.

    These are major metropolitan population centers with high development that has contributed to the degradation of all local ecosystems. This bird is not officially on the endangered list, but could be by the end of the year.


    Now the federal government is going to launch a full status review due to a scientific petition filed by the Center for Biological Diversity. There are several different factors that could be contributing to a decline in these benign birds. Climate change, over development, and even the S.F. Bay Area oil spill they had last year certainly didn't help either. There are many other reasons for the decline of the birds which can be read at the website from the Center for Biological Diversity.

    From the Press Release:
    The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned for federal protection of the ashy storm-petrel on October 15, 2007 , triggering a requirement that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service make an initial finding within 90 days. On March 27, 2008, the Center formally notified the Fish and Wildlife Service that the finding was overdue and threatened to take legal action if the decision was not immediately forthcoming. Following today’s finding that protection of the ashy storm-petrel under the Endangered Species Act may be warranted, t he Fish and Wildlife Service must now conduct a status review and issue a proposed rule to list the species by October 15, 2008.

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Mad Sheep: The True Story Behind the USDA’s War on a Family Farm

    A Fine Line Between Safety and Panic: A Sheep Story

    My grandmother’s first husband died of Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease, otherwise known as mad cow disease, years before my grandmother married my grandfather. But since that time, this disease has always been in mind – when I studied in England in 1996, I was glad to be largely vegetarian, eating only one hamburger during my time there at the height of the mad cow scare. I hear about cows being slaughtered because their flock has been contaminated. I wonder how these things happen.

    Now, I’ve read Mad Sheep: The True Story Behind the USDA’s War on a Family Farm, and my understanding of this disease is further complicated by seeing that the battle against it has wandered into hysteria and panic. It did so in the case of Faillace family, a shepherding family whose entire flock of sheep was taken away and slaughtered by the USDA because of supposed “susceptibility” to mad cow disease. There is an impossibility of sheep ever getting this disease and despite the fact that the Faillace family’s flock of sheep had been tested and was awaiting certification to show that they had no susceptibility for scrapie, “mad sheep” disease there flock was still slaughtered. The book chronicles this family’s beautiful and painful story while also educating its readers about the actual dangers of infected animals – many of whose flocks are not quarantined and who may end up in the food marketplace – and the ways that these dangers can get contorted and twisted into panic, delusions, and ineffectual solutions.

    This book is worth the read both for the heart-wrenching, anger-inspiring story it tells but also for the lovely writing and the inspiring commitment that this family has to living a life that is about promoting health and family, rather than government or big business. Linda Faillace’s story helps us understand that the USDA has ways of preventing mad cow disease but isn’t taking those methods; instead, they sometimes go to extremes of making a “point” that really has no point.

    One note – this book does itself a disservice, at least for readers like me, by including a foreword by Ronnie Cummins, National Director of the Organic Consumers Association, that reads to be alarmist and of almost a “conspiracy theory” bent. While that idea of a conspiracy certainly plays out to be true in the book, this foreword sets a paranoid tone that belies the fair and personal nature of the tragedy that the book details.

    This book has once again made me glad that I’m a vegetarian who doesn’t have concerns about ingesting animals that have been fed bonemeal or other meat products that may have come from mad cow-infected animals. But now that I’ve read this book, I will be even more cautious about what I encourage my friends and family to partake of. I will look for ways to help farmers like the Faillaces, even if it’s just by encouraging other people to read this book and spread the word about the ways our government can be dangerous and about the dangers of the meat industry itself. Oh, and I’ll probably start eating a lot more sheep’s milk cheese.

    Review Done By: Andrea Cumbo

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Friday, May 16, 2008

    $4 Gas and Still no more Bicyclists?


    According to an article by Reuters, Americans don't seem to be picking up the habit of riding their bikes regularly to work, despite the fact that gas is over $4 a gallon in some parts of the country.

    The article points out that some who can ride their bike to work, might do it. But the majority of people still live too far away from work to consider it. Their is also the danger of traffic congested roads mixed with bicyclists which can get ugly if the streets weren't designed to share the road. The article also mentions that the amount of people that regularly ride their bikes is also down compared to previous years.

    Here in Oregon, however, bicyclists seem to be a staple characteristic of what makes Oregon so green. College towns are notorious for bicyclists like Corvallis and Eugene, but even some local studies suggest that ridership is down compared to previous years. The cited reason for reduced bicyclists is poor city planning and the monopolistic car to street relationship. The local studies say if more bicycle routes and paths were developed that ridership would be up.

    Either way, I am personally making a commitment to ride my bike to work starting June 1st until September. My work is only 7 miles away and I have the leisure of taking a beautiful bike path along the Amazon Creek all the way to work. If you have the ability to ride your bike due to the proximity of your home and work, please consider riding your bike. It saves the air and saves you money from our outrageous gas prices.

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Add This Social Bookmark Button   Subscribe in a reader


    Wednesday, May 14, 2008

    New Hybrid: The Aptera

    Gas prices are skyrocketing and now more than ever we can agree we're sick of it. Fortunately, so were the people at Aptera who not only created a new hybrid but one like any other. Want a full electric version? They have that too.

    If fifty miles per gallon sounds good to you, how does bumping the mileage up to 230 miles per gallon sound? The new Aptera Hybrid

    can take you further than any hybrid available today. Its space age design is not only pleasing esthetically but it also is receiving high ratings in simulated crash testing. The Aptera will be available for purchase this year starting in October however it is only initially being released to California residents. Check out the website at Aptera.com or the video below for more details.



    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Tuesday, May 13, 2008

    20% Wind Energy by 2030?


    A report just came out from the U.S. Department of Energy at 20percentwind.org called 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply. As the name suggests the report lays out the feasibility of being able to achieve 20% of its energy from wind power!

    Under the 20% wind scenario, installations of new wind power capacity would increase to more than 16,000 megawatts per year by 2018, and continue at that rate through 2030. The U.S. doesn't even does have more than 16,000 MW in wind turbines currently installed--we passed that level in 2007. We're at about 18,000 now.


    The report identifies the problems with actually achieving 20% wind energy which includes transmission, siting, and manufacturing. However, the report gives solutions to overcome these road blocks while highlighting its potential to stave off global warming.

    The American Wind Energy Association states: as of the end of 2006 the United States had an estimated 11,603 MW of wind energy generating per year. Even though this figure seems low, there have been improvements and gains over the years. However, wind energy only accounts for 0.7% of the U.S. energy mix. If the government helped stimulate the renewable energy market, imagine where we could be today.

    We need to continue to press our elected officials to continue to secure our energy through renewable means. If we can elect a plan to achieve 20% by 2030, the United States will be recognized around the world as an environmental leader as opposed to its current backwards thinking. Lets create change, lets create jobs, lets help our country evolve.

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Add This Social Bookmark Button   Subscribe in a reader


    Monday, May 12, 2008

    Organic Food Prices On the Rise


    With the prices of conventionally grown food continuing to rise as time goes on, the prices of organic food is also rising. In some cases, the prices of organic food is now going beyond the reach of the lower and middle class. If the cost for organic food is nearly twice that of conventional products, then many people will just buy what they can afford.

    Most people buy organic food to ensure they are not receiving potentially carcinogenic toxics in their body from chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and synthetic hormones.

    As a single guy, I spend more money on groceries from the price of organics compared to my coworker who feeds an entire family of four with conventional products. Someone who can't afford to buy organic food for an entire family will buy what makes financial sense to them.

    Some farmers are actually switching back to growing conventional foods because the prices of certain crops are so high, there is no need to go through USDA organic certification. This can eventually reduce the amount of selection for organics and cause prices to go up even further.

    Due to these economic hard times with inflation and a looming recession, it feels as if a serious problem could arise if the economy doesn't stabilize soon. Simply put, organic food will only be affordable to the wealthy. What kind of world do we live in?

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Add This Social Bookmark Button   Subscribe in a reader


    Sunday, May 11, 2008

    Book Review: JavaTrekker Dispatches From the World of Fair Trade Coffee

    The Right Thing
    Review of Javatrekker by Dean Cycon

    Six shelves of coffee, at least ten feet long. French Roast, Sumatran, Decaf, Whole Bean, canisters, bags . . . so much choice for a little hot liquid in the morning. And yet, that choice could help change the lives of coffee farmers around the world. This is what I have come to understand from reading Javatrekker:Dispatches from the World of Fair Trade Coffee by Dean Cycon of Dean’s Beans. For me, now, the only choice will be one that says “fair trade” on the bag or canister. No other choice would be a right one.

    Cycon’s book chronicles his travels around the world as he meets with coffee growers and processers, trying to help them establish or improve their fair systems for selling their coffee. He visits the Oromo in Ethiopia, the Ashaninkas in Peru, the Asaro Mudmen in Papua New Guinea, and other indigineous groups, combining a belief in the power of fair trade cooperatives to improve the lives of these people with a deep knowledge and respect for the people and their cultures. His trips are not evangelical; he’s not out to save the world by making it like his. He’s traveling to help people help themselves, living up to the old “teach a man to fish” adage.

    The writing here is personal; Cycon tells us not only of the coffee, but of the rigorous treks to reach the coffee. Not just of the trees or the beans, but of the cultural customs that dominate each village he visits. Not just of the money, but of the flesh and life that has been given for what is sometimes simply a few cents a day. This book is a not a chronicle in the life of a coffee bean; it is the epic struggle of people to be treated justly and honestly for their hard work. Cycon’s words are words of a witness, a clumsy, occasionally inappropriate (as when he snaps a picture of a group of Arhuaco farmers, much to their chagrin), but always caring witness who has taken the time to know these people, to see them, to share their stories with us.

    This book would be simply another dry collection of tales from an activist who doesn’t understand the complexities of culture and who doesn’t see beyond his own goals, but it isn’t that. Cycon notes, often, that what he thought would be so simple, is simply not. From the realization that the Kenyan government has corrupted even the fair trade system, to the knowledge that the self-educated Mamos of Colombia may know more about saving the earth from humans than he (or I, for that matter) will ever know, Cycon grants that his wisdom is not unlimited, his guidance not perfect. As he says, “Our understanding of justice, in trade and society in general, cannot be confined to a formula. Fair trade, or any movement that is intended to improve the quality of life for people, is more accurately seen as a process. The more we work with the peoples in this book and beyond, the deeper we plunge into the dynamics of their societies, their ecologies, and their economies. Each layer reveals a more profound set of relationships that we must consider as we evolve toward more human and just relationships. Being open to the experiences of each culture not only makes us more aware but also makes our lives richer.” This book records a man’s journey into learning, one he undertakes because it is the right – but not always easy – thing to do.

    The next time I return to those shelves of coffee I will remember Dean Cycon and the people he has introduced me to through his words. Now, I will only buy fair trade coffee, trusting that while it is the more expensive and therefore harder thing, it is the right thing to do.

    Review Done By: Andrea Cumbo

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Saturday, May 10, 2008

    The Mighty Sea Turtle


    If you have ever seen a sea turtle than you know may know and understand the beauty of these creatures. Unfortunately, the death rate among them is increasing and without help to stop this it will result in extinction for these precious animals. Sea turtles are not very fast or quick on land which leaves them vulnerable for poachers to harm them and steal their eggs which is a delicacy in many parts of the world.

    There are many other reasons for these innocent and brutal killings. Calipee is a cartilage that is literally cut out of the live turtle from the bones under the shell. This sadly means a slow painful death for the turtle as the helpless animal is left struggling on the beach. Unfortunately, eliminating turtle trade completely would be hard because many cultures rely on them. The Japanese support some of their economy with turtle shell products. German soup makers depend on calipee for turtle soup and in Nicaragua turtle hunting is a way to make a living.

    Also men in Mexico were buying turtle eggs from locals in hopes of getting the effect of Viagra which is a myth. Recently, Mexican authorities announced they will use campaign posters of scantily dressed young women to promote the protection of endangered sea turtles. The poster reads in Spanish "My man doesn't need turtle eggs". I am not a feminist by any means so in my opinion that is a great way to get some attention towards this problem.

    Death is part of the natural world, although when humans heavily contribute to the demise of a species, we can do our part to make sure they can survive for generations to come by making changes.

    Written by our new contributor: Angie

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Add This Social Bookmark Button Subscribe in a reader


    DDT Found In Penguins



    DDT is a pesticide that was banned decades ago. However, traces of DDT are still found to this day! But how in the world is a pesticide showing up in Antarctica you ask?

    According to sea bird experts, the most likely cause is from build up from melting glaciers. DDT has been known to be in the fatty tissues of these birds, but not enough to harm them. The surprise is that these levels of DDT haven't gone down. The United States banned DDT in the 1970's, and other countries have as well.

    DDT, and other pesticides, actually travel through the atmosphere toward the polar regions by a process of evaporation and then condensation in cooler climates. Penguins feed off tiny sea creatures called krill that live in melted glacier water, and DDT is brought up the food chain directly to the penguins.

    Although DDT is banned, the United States and the rest of the world should adopt a policy of extensive research before approving toxic chemicals that can leave long lasting damage to our environment.

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

    Add This Social Bookmark Button Subscribe in a reader


    Road Kill Hurting Ecosystems

    This article is by no means suggesting that we should stop driving or building new roads, rather it is merely raising awareness of the fact that our ecosystems are continuing to degrade. Sometimes there are very few practical solutions to some of the problems we have, but it does not mean we should be ignorant of the problems.

    Scientists estimate that one-third of amphibian species are threatened, and hundreds of species have gone extinct in the past two decades alone. The reasons are habitat loss, disease, pollution, competition from introduced exotic species and climate change. Well now road kill can be added on that list.


    Frogs, toads, and salamanders are all amphibians that serve vital roles in many ecosystems. They are consumers of insects and a food source for carnivores. To maintain healthy ecosystems it is important to limit the deaths of amphibians.

    A main location of these incidents is a one mile stretch road with wetlands surrounding it in West Lafayette, Indiana. During a 17 month study researchers found 10,500 dead animals along 11 miles of roads. Of those 7,600 were frogs of unidentifiable species and another 1,700 were bullfrogs.

    A recent study published showed that the number of animals killed were significantly underestimated because they were scavenged by other animals, destroyed beyond recognition or moved. About five times more animals died than could be recorded. The dead included 142 road killed eastern tiger salamanders which doesn't seem like a lot but most of them were up to 10 years old or females bearing eggs on the their way to making an annual trip to their breeding grounds where they often lay 500 to 1,000 eggs. This could make a big difference for the population. Researchers also found 74 dead northern leopard frogs, a species of special conservation concern in Indiana. Other animals were involved in this study which included:

  • 79 opossums, the most common mammal
  • chimney swifts, the most common bird
  • common garter snakes, the most common reptile
  • raccoons and
  • white tailed deer

    These roads are literally having an environmental impact! Scientists believe there are options to help this problem like underpasses, viaducts, overpasses to allow wildlife safe crossing and special fences will help. Habitats like wetlands and rain forests are declining and this is just one more problem that isn't going to fix itself unless some action is taken.

    Written by our New Contributor: Angie

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...

  • Grass May Reduce Global Warming

    Although you can't actually hear a cow burp they are constantly releasing methane. When they digest grass, micro flora in their gut breaks down. Methane is the majority of what is burped up, a contributing factor in greenhouse gases. Scientists from a plant breeding research center in Australia are developing a new kind of grass that has been tested in the lab and glasshouses and are now planning field trials. Farmers should be able to maintain their dairy herds, productivity and profitability while cutting down gassy burps and reducing their contribution to global warming.



    The dairy industry definitely has an impact on greenhouse gas emissions and Britain's target is to cut them by 20% by 2010. The goal is to have 20-30% of milk producers trying out new technology to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the year 2015.

    There is some controversy about the breakdown process of the new grass and if it in fact will reduce methane. A lecturer in farm animal health says that a diet too rich in highly digestible carbs can actually increase the amount of methane a cow belches out. And a professor of animal science says more digestible forage could push up a cows absolute methane emissions but productivity gains would mean less methane per unit of milk.

    As long as this new technology remains new, I am sure there are some kinks that need to be worked out. If it pans out, it could really help the reach their greenhouse gas reduction goals in the UK and around the world.

    Written by our new Contributor: Angie

    Thoughts, Comments, Questions...