LA Plans a Massive Water Conservation Plan

But what is the city doing NOW? I still see the watering of city property in the heat of the day. i don't see any effort to plant drought resistant landscaping NOW on city property…in fact, SAN PEDRO just unveiled a fountain that uses 400 THOUSAND GALLONS of water!!!! Why spend 2 BILLION dollars when they can't do things that SAVE money NOW?!

Getting rid of the 17th century "Crapper" that gulps up to 16 gal per use, and substituting Swedish, composting toilets, then using the perfectly safe compost to strengthen American Top-soil, would make too m8ch good sense! So would catching the Urine, processing and re-using it to replace oil based fertilizers, so my guess is an elaborate scheme involving billions of Govt monies, many corrupt contracts, a lot of "favored folk" jobs and in the end, no real benefit at all – the American Way! and why GM is broke, Hyundai is growing and the BYD is soon to arrive on our shores to outsell the now govt sponsored "Volt" a crock of shiite to start with!

They a many waterless car wash products to try. A waterless car wash can wash and wax a car with out using any water.

This plan has advantages and disadvantages. The advantages i see is that this will boost the amount of water productivity and increase the supply available while also lowering or stabilizing the cost of water. This will also help for the dryer seasons when water is not as readily available. The disadvantages i see is that this will decrease the natural fertilization that runoff, and excessive water create. This will cause more water to be in pipes, treatment centers, or even water reserve centers just sitting their in the event we need them while causing the water source in nature to diminish because we are removing a larger amount. Now this may not cause a large noticeable disadvantage but if too much water conservation policies or projects are put into place in a location needing water then it might just deplete the supply leaving the area dry.