An Alternative View of Global Warming
I must admit that I have been reluctant to accept a new theory or reason behind global warming that wasn't contributed to by greenhouse gases. The reason for not "converting" was due to lack of any information...perhaps this information was suppressed, but now is out. This article and the embedded video below have convinced me otherwise a global scam and questions the Global Warming mantra being corn fed into the public's mindset. This story has CONSPIRACY written all over it, and it brings up a lot of questions. I, for one, feel that I should re-design this blog to a more broader sense of concern for the environment...instead of perpetuating the global warming agenda...being that mankind is at fault for global warming. Saying this, I DO still believe that big industry should be held accountable for their carbon dioxide emissions due to their harmful effect on the environment...but I strongly disagree with a government aimed at controlling people with an excuse of saving the
planet. I DO support alternative energy and reducing our foreign dependence on oil...and yes I even drive a hybrid. By no means am I saying that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide are not factors in our warming, but merely that they may not be the only reason. For reasons of not wanting to side with one agenda or another, I will change my stance to that of a neutral one, and merely use my blog to report the environmental changes of our current warming, regardless of how that is actually happening, while at the same time promoting Alternative Energy and conservation.
To that end...other scientists that have data that can explain a different theory for our current global warming...MUST NOT be discounted and SHOULD be heard. Various scientists speaking against the MAINSTREAM theory have received death threats and have been ridiculed and deemed as low as Holocaust deniers. When attacks such as these begin to emerge...it should make one think of a reason for them. Article about the death threats
Reference Article: Mars, Jupiter, and other Planets also experiencing Global Warming
So scientists and astronomers have noticed that the Earth is heating up, but so are Mars, Pluto, and other world's in our solar system...leading scientists to believe that the sun is the cause of global warming, not human induced carbon dioxide emissions.
While there is evidence to suggest that solar activity such as solar flares and sun spots can affect climate on Earth, many climate scientists and astrophysicists agree that the global warming we are experiencing now is attributed to man. Regardless of whether or not man is contributing to global warming, I still believe there should be a push to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and that people should conserve their energy consumption. This is my my two cents for the day...







3 COMMENTS, ADD YOURS HERE:
You may want to view this post for yet another view of global warming.
http//endangeredspaces.blogspot.com/2007/03/gag-order-given-to-us-scientists.html
I would like to trade links if you are willing. Leave me a comment on ES.
I must say I did clap in appreciation when I read your post on this.
I don't believe anyone is saying man is not contributing to changes, but al gore's movie has been replicit with factual errors and incomplete submissions.
I applaud your ability to look at both sides, and even look at something you may not agree with because you feel so strongly because of what you first learned, that as you said is being spoonfed to the public.
Alot of dissenting opinions have been threatened, gagged, demeaned, funding yanked, and not reported on.
As I was saying, man has contributed, but the devestation so predicted by so many alarmists is not happening, and in fact not even going as they predicted...something alarmists tried back in the 90's I believe with a global cooling.
I have no problem and fully support looking for alternative fuels, going nuclear for power, ect. There is nothing wrong with conserving energy.
Buy being forced into agreements such as Kyoto in which many countries who are part of that have not even conformed to it, ect is not the way to go, espeially when it looks as if Kyoto is more of a failure.
The earth has gone through warming and colling periods based on many factors, factors in which 'climatologists' using computer models can't take into measurement - so their models are incorrect and inaccurate, but that doesn't stop them from rasing alarms.
Volcanic activity, radiation, the orbit we have with the sun itself, the axis tilt of earth (beleive it or not the earth 'wobbles' in its trajectory around the sun), sun spots, and many other contributing factors raise or lower the temperature of the earth.
Some of the debates I have been part of have noticed things like:
CO2 is also added to the air by rotting Old Growth timber. Conversely O2 is made with young forests, commonly called second growth, though the tree farmers I know are on their third crop.
Did you know that President Bush seems to be more 'green' than Al Gore? At least in how his house is...
http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/26/al-gore-gw-hypocrite/#comment-699838
Another breakdown on al gores movie, gets taken apart here:
http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/25/gagworthy-moment-of-the-week-wapo-piece-on-rock-star-al-gore/#comment-699668
An interesting discussion on the dangers of subverting science by relying on models and wishful thinking rather than rigorous adherence to the scientific method and some of the problems with using computer models as “proof” (the model is part the hypothesis not part of the proof by experimental observation).
http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=118638
I was once told to find the real motivation behind some of the alarmists view of global warming that you should follow the money:
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20070219-102043-5765r.htm
- Scientists who use climate change to explain environmental changes improve their chances of getting research grants from foundations, corporations
- Politicians can curry favor with activists who support re-election campaigns and higher aspirations; transform $14 billion in alternative energy pork into ethical planetary protection; and promote policies that otherwise would raise eyebrows.
- Environmental activists use climate fears to raise billions of dollars via direct mail and foundation and corporate grants — to promote government control over resource use, technological change and economic development.
- giving ED (Enviromental Defense) direct monetary and policy stakes in the banking, investment and political arenas, and in any carbon allowance or cap-and-trade programs Congress might enact.
ED designed and led the disingenuous campaign that caused many health-care agencies to ban DDT, resulting in millions of deaths from malaria. Along with Greenpeace, Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists and other groups, it still posts deceitful claims about DDT online, perpetuating the disease. By blaming climate change for malaria, they deflect criticism for their vile actions.
Another link dealing with ICe Cores:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070218-100445-1207r.htm
Just some things to think and look at......even if it doesn't help, it at least will give you some ideas, thoughts and differing views to read through.
This theory was debunked a while back.
Post a Comment